<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Commentaires sur : Victoire 03	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://dev.meettheredbaron.com/fr/event/victory-03/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://dev.meettheredbaron.com/fr/event/victory-03/</link>
	<description>The life and death of Manfred von Richthofen.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Par : heinpoblome		</title>
		<link>https://dev.meettheredbaron.com/fr/event/victory-03/#comment-545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[heinpoblome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2023 12:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.meettheredbaron.com/event/victory-03/#comment-545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Source: Inside the victories of Manfred von richthofen - Volume 1, James F. Miller, Aeronaut Books, 2016

The colors and markings description of Richthofen&#039;s Albatros D.I is the result of &quot;reverse engineering&quot; several photographs of Richthofen standing near an overpainted Albatros D.II with a white stripe around its engine cowl. Reasonable circumstantial photographic provenance suggests (but does not prove) this D.II was his personal machine, regardless of its serial number (which cannot be seen). Researcher Lance Bronnenkant generously provided new photographs first published in his Blue Max Airmen Series Vol. 5 that shows a Jasta 2 Albatros D.I overpainted in the same manner, also with a white stripe around its engine cowl. The logical speculative conclusion based on the similar markings is this D.I likely was also Richthofen&#039;s. 

In photographs of this machine, the &quot;3&quot; and the &quot;1&quot; in the serial number can be determined but the middle digit cannot, aside from its round shape suggesting 0,3,6,8 or 9. That the serial number begins with a 3 identifies the machine as from the 12 Albatros D-type pre-production machines, numbered 380/16 to 391/16; which eliminates 0,3, and 6 as the middle digit and limits the remaining choices to either 381/16 or 391/16. Careful scrutiny via Photoshop reveals the right side of the middle digit is a continuous arc, more closely resembling a 9 than an 8, which would have a midpoint indentation. The digit thickness is consistent with a 9 as well, whereas an 8 would be very thin on its upper right side, and that is not present in the photograph. 391/16 is a well-known machine that was studied and photographed extensively after it was brought down by a bullet to the radiator and subsequently captured intact (16 November 1916, pilot Ltn. Karl Büttner, PoW). It was repaired and test-flown by the British until it crashed via unknown circumstances and presumably destroyed. If 391/16 were formerly Richthofen&#039;s there is no trace of any overpainted white nose stripe in any post-capture photograph, although ostensibly Büttner would have removed Richthofen&#039;s personal white stripe when adding his own markings, a large &quot;Bü&quot; on both sides of the fuselage adjacent the cockpit. Additionally, at some point a thin white outline had been added to at least the port fuselage cross.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source: Inside the victories of Manfred von richthofen &#8211; Volume 1, James F. Miller, Aeronaut Books, 2016</p>
<p>The colors and markings description of Richthofen&rsquo;s Albatros D.I is the result of « reverse engineering » several photographs of Richthofen standing near an overpainted Albatros D.II with a white stripe around its engine cowl. Reasonable circumstantial photographic provenance suggests (but does not prove) this D.II was his personal machine, regardless of its serial number (which cannot be seen). Researcher Lance Bronnenkant generously provided new photographs first published in his Blue Max Airmen Series Vol. 5 that shows a Jasta 2 Albatros D.I overpainted in the same manner, also with a white stripe around its engine cowl. The logical speculative conclusion based on the similar markings is this D.I likely was also Richthofen&rsquo;s. </p>
<p>In photographs of this machine, the « 3 » and the « 1 » in the serial number can be determined but the middle digit cannot, aside from its round shape suggesting 0,3,6,8 or 9. That the serial number begins with a 3 identifies the machine as from the 12 Albatros D-type pre-production machines, numbered 380/16 to 391/16; which eliminates 0,3, and 6 as the middle digit and limits the remaining choices to either 381/16 or 391/16. Careful scrutiny via Photoshop reveals the right side of the middle digit is a continuous arc, more closely resembling a 9 than an 8, which would have a midpoint indentation. The digit thickness is consistent with a 9 as well, whereas an 8 would be very thin on its upper right side, and that is not present in the photograph. 391/16 is a well-known machine that was studied and photographed extensively after it was brought down by a bullet to the radiator and subsequently captured intact (16 November 1916, pilot Ltn. Karl Büttner, PoW). It was repaired and test-flown by the British until it crashed via unknown circumstances and presumably destroyed. If 391/16 were formerly Richthofen&rsquo;s there is no trace of any overpainted white nose stripe in any post-capture photograph, although ostensibly Büttner would have removed Richthofen&rsquo;s personal white stripe when adding his own markings, a large « Bü » on both sides of the fuselage adjacent the cockpit. Additionally, at some point a thin white outline had been added to at least the port fuselage cross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
